Legal Opinion

Manning v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 9, 1993No. 93 Civ. 1335 (LBS)PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAND, District Judge.

This is an action brought by petitioner Timothy Manning against respondent Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. Inc., to vacate an arbitration award rendered by a panel of the New York Stock Exchange. Before the Court is respondent’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the ground that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. We find that there is no federal question present and no diversity of citizenship between the parties, and we therefore grant the motion to dismiss the petition.

The factual background can be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,013 Leonard Brawer v. The Options Clearing Corporation and American Stock Exchange, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. Brawer v. Options Clearing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  3. Quick & Reilly, Inc. v. JacobsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Philip Barbara v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Manning v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  3. GOINES v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2023
  4. GOINES v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2023
  5. GOINES v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2023

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API