Legal Opinion

Manning v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 18, 1993No. 93 Civ. 1335 (LBS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAND, District Judge.

Currently before the Court is plaintiffs motion for reconsideration of our opinion dated June 9, 1993, familiarity with which is presumed 822 F.Supp. 1081. Plaintiffs motion is granted and upon reconsideration, we adhere to our previous opinion.

Plaintiff contends that this Court made a manifest error of law when we stated, citing Brawer v. Options Clearing Corp., 807 F.2d 297 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 819, 108 S.Ct. 76, 98 L.Ed.2d 39 (1987), that it is settled law in this Circuit that there is no private right of action under § 6 of the Securities and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pompano-Windy City Partners, Ltd. v. Bear Stearns & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  2. Manning v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,013 Leonard Brawer v. The Options Clearing Corporation and American Stock Exchange, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Philip Barbara v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API