Legal Opinion

Scheit v. Duffy

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1945PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The question is whether the testimony, construed most favorably to the plaintiff, requires the submission of the issue to the jury.

The plaintiff alleges a conspiracy to evict him from his home. In order to prevail, he must produce testimony that defendants acted in concert and jointly assented to prosecution of the unlawful enterprise. “Disconnected circumstances, any one of which, or all of which, are just as consistent with a lawful purpose as with an unlawful undertaking are insufficient to establish a conspiracy.” 15 C. J. S., Conspiracy, p. 1047, sec. 30, and cases there cited. Although,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boyce v. Independent Cleaners, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maleki v. Fine-Lando Clinic Chartered, S.C.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Allen & O'Hara, Inc. v. Barrett Wrecking, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Jolin v. OsterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Eiden v. HovdeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Allen & O'hara, Inc. v. Barrett Wrecking, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API