Christensen v. Schwartz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed December 4, 1928:
Stevens, J.
Upon the record presented, the question of, whether defendant Schwartz participated in any conspiracy to defraud was one for the jury to determine.
The verdict rendered is however insufficient to warrant a judgment against defendant Schwartz. Under the five-sixths jury law, sec. 270.25 of the Statutes, at least ten jurors must agree upon the answers to all questions that are essential to establish the liability of the defendant Schwartz. That rule requires that at least the same ten jurors must agree as to the answers that establish…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bentson v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Will v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by12 opinions
- Clark v. STRAINOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Ward v. WeekesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- Waters v. MarkhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Naumburg v. WagnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Nelson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.