Legal Opinion

Pomeroy v. Sam Thorpe Mining Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1931No. Civil No. 2923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

On January 5, 1905, Sam Thorpe and J. T. Arrowsmith duly located two mining claims, under the names “Dixie King” and “Superior King,” situated in the Pioneer mining district, Pinal county. Together they performed the annual representation work on the claims until in 1908, when Arrowsmith died, leaving surviving him his wife, Henrietta, and a minor child named Lee. Thereafter, during the years 1911, 1912, 1913, 1914 and 1915, Thorpe performed labor and improvements upon each of said mining claims of the value of $100 for each year.

December 9, 1916, Thorpe conveyed by deed all his right, title…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Lindeke v. Associates Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Elder v. Horseshoe Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Elder v. Horseshoe Mining and Milling Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Badger Gold Min. & Mill. Co. v. Stockton Gold & Copper Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Town of Hurley v. New Mexico Municipal Boundary CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Jackson v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  3. Jackson v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  4. Cornwall v. BairdAlaska Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API