Legal Opinion

Elder v. Horseshoe Mining and Milling Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1897PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Lawrence county. Hon A. J. Plowman, Judge. Plaintiffs had judgment, and defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, P. J.

In January, 1878, Charles H. Havens and Rufus Wilsey located a mining claim in the Biack Hills under the name of the “Golden Sand Lode.” In June, 1878, Wilsey died, leaving a widow and several children, who then, and have ever since, resided in the state of Iowa. After the death of Wilsey, Havens continued to make the required annual expenditure upon the claim until 1892, when he sold the same to Thomas H. White, the managing agent of the defendant. At the time of his sale, Havens assumed to be the owner of the whole claim, by virtue of proceedings taken under the provisions of Sec. 2324,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beckett v. SeloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Janes v. ThrockmortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Brenham v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. In re Estate of WoodworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Meeks v. HahnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Aberle v. MerkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  2. O'Hanlon v. Ruby Gulch Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. In Re Guider's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Castleman v. RedfordNevada Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Pomeroy v. Sam Thorpe Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API