Legal Opinion

Stone v. Stephens

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1951No. 32434PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The question of law presented in this case is whether an insured may lawfully change the beneficiary designated in his insurance policy by the execution of a last will and testament where not ex*598pressly or impliedly authorized to do so by the terms of the insurance contract.

Specifically, the question is whether the insured effectively designated a new and different beneficiary of his life insurance policies by the execution of a last will and testament wherein he directed that if he died unmarried all his property should go to Permelia Stephens, his grandmother.

The issues are presented upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Dogariu v. DogariuMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Katz v. Ohio National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Wannamaker v. StromanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  5. Oetting v. SparksOhio Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Aetna Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Doss v. KalasArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Kane v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Nationwide Life Insurance v. MyersOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Lincoln Life & Annuity Co. v. CaswellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API