Katz v. Ohio National Bank
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
Counsel for both parties are agreed that the important question in this case is: “Whose money was it that paid the notes of the Huntington National Bank?”
Counsel for plaintiff in error maintain that it was the money of Stella M. Katz, received by her from the insurance policies of Leo Katz, in which she was named as beneficiary; while counsel for defendant in error contend that, by virtue of the assignments, the Huntington National Bank acquired the legal title to the insurance policies and to so much of the proceeds thereof as might be necessary to satisfy the promissory notes, obtaining in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barbin v. MooreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
- Farracy v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Potter v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Mercer National Bank v. White'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Oetting v. SparksOhio Supreme Court · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ferguson v. OwensOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Gallagher's WillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Livingston v. SheltonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Matthews v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
- Stone v. StephensOhio Supreme Court · 1951
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.