Legal Opinion

Wannamaker v. Stroman

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 22, 1932No. 13520PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

November 22, 1932. The opinion of the Court. was delivered by The controversy in this case arises out of the claim of judgment creditors of Mrs. Maggie A. Stroman to have the proceeds of certain life insurance policies issued upon the life of her husband, Z.E. Stroman, applied to the payment of their judgments.

The undisputed facts are these: Z.E. Stroman, husband of Mrs. Stroman, at the time of his death in August, 1930, held three policies of life insurance, which for convenience shall be designated as A, B and C.

Policy A was for $1,500.00; the beneficiary was Mrs. Stroman; it contained a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Antley v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  2. Bost v. Volunteer State Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  3. Pilcher v. PuckettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. Taff v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  5. Abbott v. Supreme Colony United Order of Pilgrim FathersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Doss v. KalasArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Pedron v. OldsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  3. Kane v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Stone v. StephensOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Parks' Ex'rs v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API