State v. Haywood
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
Defendant was charged with the crime of indecent liberties. He waived his right to á'jury trial and was found guilty by the trial judge.. He was subsequently sentenced and has appealed. Counsel on' appeal 'was appointed solely for the appéál by the trial court'. Courisel has filed a motion requesting permission to withdraw as counsel on the basis that no grounds for the appeal exist pursuant to An-ders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Counsel has filed a brief in which he sets out six categories denominated “Possible Assignments of Error.”
Two of these…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In RE OLSEN v. DelmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. ForzaWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. HueyWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Williard v. Federal Surety Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BeishirSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- State v. GilcristCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- State v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- State v. BennettWashington Supreme Court · 2026