Legal Opinion

State v. Forza

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1966No. 38473PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Langsdorf, J. † —

The trial court found the defendant guilty of assault in the second degree, and from the judgment and sentence to the Washington State Penitentiary the defendant appeals. Counsel on appeal did not represent appellant during the trial.

At the time set for trial the following occurred:

The Court: Do I understand that the defendant has waived his right to a jury trial?

Mr. Alfieri: That is right. I might inform the court, for the record, that he understands this is a constitutional right that he has and that I have discussed it with him and also discussed what I thought the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. State v. LaneWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State v. EllisWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. In RE SUMMERS v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Larned v. BurlingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1867

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. City of Bellevue v. AcreyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. WickeWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. CoyleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. BugaiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API