Legal Opinion

Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. American Medical Services, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1974No. 205PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

The validity of a “due on sale” provision in a mortgage was upheld in the Wire Works Case. As to an acceleration clause, phrased in the exact language of the provision involved in the case before us, this court held such “ ‘due . . . if . . . convey [ed] away ... or if the title thereto shall become vested in any other’ ” clause not to be against public policy and held it to be “. . . enforceable as a contractual condition of the note and mortgage.” However, it also held that the invocation of the acceleration clause must be “in accord with equitable principles,” with the trial court to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Clark v. LachenmeierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. Marion v. ORSON'S CAMERA CENTERS, INC.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Estate of DemosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Crockett v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Shuput v. LauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Pleasure Time, Inc. v. KussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Occidental Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Venco PartnershipNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Continental Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API