Simpson v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.

ALMA WILSON, J,

dissenting:

¶ 1 Today, this Court gives its imprimatur to the practice of selling multiple medical expense coverages for multiple premiums without advising the purchaser that the coverage is limited to a single policy. The policy’s terms of limitation are ambiguous and this deceptive practice violates the spirit of 36 O.S.1991, § 6092. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

¶ 2 Floyd Simpson had four separate automobile insurance policies issued by Farmers Insurance Company, Inc. Each policy provided coverage for Simpson’s medical expenses in the event he was injured “while…