Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Estate of Greenfield

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 21, 1993No. 72,060PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Vice Chief Justice.

We decide here whether language of a motor vehicle exclusion in a homeowner’s insurance policy excludes liability coverage for bodily injury and medical payments for a motorcycle-automobile accident where the claim against the insured is based on the theory of negligent supervision of or failure to control a child. We hold the exclusion precludes coverage.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The following facts are either agreed to by the parties or the record shows they are undisputed. Ricky Greenfield (Greenfield) owned a motorcycle. He allowed his son, Rocky Greenfield…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dodson v. St. Paul Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Dayton Hudson Corp. v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Bankert Ex Rel. Habush v. Threshermen's Mutual Ins.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Great Central Insurance Co. v. RoemmichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. American Iron & MacHine Works Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Coosewoon v. Meridian Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. May v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. BP America, Inc. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  5. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Cowen Construction Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API