Legal Opinion
People v. Ranger Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 13, 2000No. Nos. B128613, B129250PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NOTT, J.
In two appeals that have been consolidated, Ranger Insurance Company (Ranger) challenges: 1) the denial of a motion to extend time to set aside a bail forfeiture; and 2) the summary judgment entered against Ranger on the same forfeiture.
*678This is a case of first impression. It involves the interpretation of Penal Code section 1305.4,1 which requires a showing of good cause in order to extend the time in which the forfeiture of a bail bond may be exonerated. We hold that appellate review of section 1305.4 is made under the abuse of discretion standard. We further hold that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Foster v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Honig v. Financial Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- County of Los Angeles v. Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- County of Orange v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. FroehligCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. Financial Casualty & SuretyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. Seneca InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. Accredited Surety & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. Alistar InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- County of Los Angeles v. Fairmont Specialty GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.