Legal Opinion
County of Los Angeles v. Fairmont Specialty Group
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 18, 2008No. B199011PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERLUSS, P. J.
Fairmont Specialty Group (Fairmont) appeals from the trial court’s order denying its motion to extend the 180-day period to vacate a bail bond forfeiture and to exonerate the bond (Pen. Code, § 1305.4). Fairmont contends the trial court lacked jurisdiction to declare bail forfeited because it failed to order bail forfeited on the date of Antonio Vasquez’s first nonappearance in the case and abused its discretion in denying the motion because Fairmont demonstrated good cause to justify an extension of time. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
1. Proceedings in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. United Bonding InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. Allegheny Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. Classified Ins. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. American Bankers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. American Bankers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. Financial Casualty & SuretyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. Fairmont Specialty GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- County of Los Angeles v. Financial Casualty & Surety, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2018
- County of Los Angeles v. Williamsburg National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Int'l Fid. Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.