Legal Opinion

Life & Casualty Insurance v. Roland

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 29, 1932No. 22018PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins; P. J.

1. The term “automobile” is the general name which has been adopted, by popular use and approval, for all forms of self-propelling vehicles for use on highways and streets for general freight and passenger service. An automobile-truck comes within the general acceptation of the term “automobile.” 6 O. J. 867; Cater v. State, 12 Ga. App. 430, 436 (78 S. E. 205) ; Bonds v. State, 16 Ga. App. 401, 404 (85 S. E. 629). An automobile-truck is an’automobile within the meaning of a policy of insurance providing for indemnification in case of injury to the insured “by any accident to any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. American National Insurance v. BrantleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. Bonds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Buckeye Union Casualty Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1957
  2. Seaford v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Mrs. Harold S. Willingham Nee Francis S. McCall v. Life & Casualty Insurance Company of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  4. Jernigan v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API