Legal Opinion

American National Insurance v. Brantley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 30, 1928No. 18668PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, R. J.

1. An assured may direct that the money be paid to his assignee, and ■where such direction is assented to by the insurer, no other person can defeat it. Civil Code (1910), § 2498. “At common law [the assignee] could not sue at law, but under modern statutes he ■ may, and in most States must sue. In any event it is clear that an assignment of a policy of insurance, consented to by the insurer, effectuates a new contract with the assignee, on which the assignee may sue in his own name. . . The fact that the assignee may not be entitled as against third persons to retain the whole…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New Zealand Fire Insurance v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Ancient Order United Workmen v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Alliance Insurance v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  4. Brown v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Primerica Life Insurance v. HumfleetCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. Life & Casualty Insurance v. RolandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. National Casualty Co. v. BorochoffCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  4. Mutual Savings Life Insurance v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. American Eagle Fire Insurance v. McKinnonArizona Supreme Court · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API