Legal Opinion
Seaford v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 20, 1961No. 381PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WiNBORNE, C. J.:
Both plaintiff and defendant agree that the questions presented on this appeal are these:
“1. Is a tractor-trailer unit not ‘an automobile’ within the meaning of the so-called non-owned coverage provisions of the Family Comprehensive Liability Policy?
“2. Was the plaintiff a textile worker who had been employed to operate a tractor-trailer unit for the one trip only, using this equipment ‘in any business or occupation’ of the plaintiff within the meaning of the policy?
“3. Did the non-waiver agreement entered into by the plaintiff apply under the circumstances herein to the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hoosier Cas. Co. of Indianapolis, Ind. v. FoxDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
- Robert D. Voelker v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- Allstate Insurance v. HoffmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
- Behringer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Buckeye Union Casualty Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Hays v. Country Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. McConnaughyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- LaPoint v. RichardsWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Royal Indemnity Company v. Henry Clingan and Linda ClinganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.