Legal Opinion

Elmore v. Aloha Sanitary Service

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1970PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

This is an action for personal injuries sustained by an employee of a contractor who was engaged in the construction of sewer trenches for the defendant sewer district, pursuant to a contract. The trial court held that defendant was protected by government immunity. We need not decide if the complaint otherwise states a cause of action and that there would be a duty and responsibility from the sanitary district to this employee if governmental immunity did not attach because we affirm the trial court’s decision.

Because of the enactment of ORS 30.310 et seq. it would not be advisable to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vendrell v. School District No. 26COregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Giaconi v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Lovell v. School District No. 13Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
  4. McCombs v. City of AsheboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Wickman v. Housing AuthorityOregon Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Espinosa v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Espinosa v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Wallace M. Telford v. Clackamas County Housing Authority, Ralph Groener, Robert Schumacher, Jono D. HildnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Espinosa v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API