Legal Opinion

Pinkinson v. Pinkinson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 28, 1921PublishedCited by 18 opinions

On appeal from the court of chancery advised bjr Vice-Chancellor Fielder, and reported in 91 N. J. Eq. 281.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Katzenbach, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of the court of chancery for the payment to the complainant-respondent of alimony, under *670the statute, by the defendant-appellant. The complainant and defendant were married in June, 1909. One child, a girl of eight years of age, is the issue of the marriage. The serenity of their married life was brief. Within two years differences arose, due, principally, to the presence in the home of the defendant’s mother, who assumed the entire domestic management of the household. The presence of the mother-in-law and…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Keller v. LinsenmyerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  2. Pedersen v. PedersenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  3. O'Brien v. O'BrienNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  4. Pierson v. PiersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  5. Untermann v. UntermannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API