Legal Opinion

Rushmore v. Rushmore

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 23, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

G-eosman, A. M.

Complainant sues for separate maintenance under section 26 of our Divorce act. The defendant, by his answer, as well as by a separate petition for divorce, charges the complainant with statutory desertion and seeks a decree of divorce against her on this ground. The two actions have been consolidated.

Heretofore the complainant herein sued the defendant for separate maintenance in this court (D. 84-247). Her bill of complaint in the original suit filed on the 29th day of April, 1931, charged the defendant with extreme cruelty consisting generally of physical brutalit}»-, abusive…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Porritt v. PorrittMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Locher v. LocherNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  3. Goldberg v. GoldbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
  4. Hann v. HannNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1899
  5. McKee v. McKeeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morrone v. MorroneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. Cote v. CoteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Pobst v. PobstMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Cote v. CoteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API