Legal Opinion
People v. Henwood
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 13, 1900PublishedCited by 20 opinions
Exceptions before judgment from Van Burén; Smith, J. William J. Henwood was convicted of a violation of the local-option law.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The respondent was prosecuted for an alleged violation of section 25, Act No. 183, Pub. Acts 1899, which provides:
“Every druggist keeping a drug-store in any county adopting prohibition under this act shall make and swear to, or cause to be made and sworn to, a true written or printed statement, signed and duly sworn to by himself or his clerk, on Monday of each and every week, giving the full name and residence of every person procuring liquor at his drug-store during the last week, the kind and quantity of liquor procured, and the date of procuring the same, and the object for which each…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Robison v. HaugMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. . RosenheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Commonwealth v. BloombergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Erickson v. EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- E. Fougera & Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- People v. ShulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.