Legal Opinion

Jarosz v. Caesar Realty, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1974No. Docket 15876PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, P. J.

Plaintiff claimed damages for extra work performed under a building construction contract. The trial court found for plaintiff, awarding him approximately $75,000. Defendants appeal by right, and plaintiff cross-appeals.

In October, 1967, plaintiff agreed to construct a manufacturing plant for defendants. The contract provided that plaintiff would construct a building shell for $886,817. He was obligated to submit bids for interior and exterior mechanical, plumbing, heating, electrical, and office finishing work, items expressly excluded from the contract price. No bids, save plaintiff’s own…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coger v. MacKinaw Products Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Klas v. Pearce Hardware & Furniture Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Biagini v. MocnikMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Pittsburgh Filter Manufacturing Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. G. O. Lewis Co. v. ErvingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cascade Electric Co. v. RiceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. LeZontier v. ShockMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Hayman Co. v. Brady Mechanical, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Performance Abatement Services, Inc. v. Lansing Board of Water & LightDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
  5. Falkner v. FalknerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API