Legal Opinion

Costa v. Gorton-Pew Vessels Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 1, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The captain of a fishing vessel owned by the defendant bought of the plaintiff, a dealer in fishermen’s outfits and supplies, fishing gear to replace lost and condemned gear, which was delivered on board the ship. The question for decision is, whether the defendant is responsible for the amount of the purchase. While there is no evidence, and no claim is made, of any express authority given by the defendant, it is contended that the captain “had an implied authority to bind the owners arising from custom and the situation.”

The vessel sailed on what is called the one fifth Provincetown lay…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conahan v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Procter v. Atlantic Fish CompaniesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Adams v. AugustineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Rich v. JordanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  5. Paine v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Agoos Kid Co. v. Blumenthal Import Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Cromwell v. SlaneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
  3. Larson v. Lewis-Simas-Jones Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Cromwell v. SlaneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API