Procter v. Atlantic Fish Companies
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
This is an action for breach of warranty in the sale of three hundred and fifty barrels, and for the breach of an executory contract for the sale by description of forty-one barrels of salt mackerel. The plaintiffs’ firm did business in Gloucester and the defendant company in Lunenburg, Nova Scotia. One of the plaintiffs’ employees, McKinnon by name, had seen the three hundred and fifty barrels on a wharf in Lunenburg in the first week of November, 1906. By an interchange of telegrams between the parties on November 10, 1906, the plaintiff bought the three hundred and fifty barrels, agreeing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barrie v. QuinbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Rowe v. Inhabitants of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Edgar v. Joseph Breck & Sons Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Gould v. SteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Mooney v. Howard InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Conahan v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Agoos Kid Co. v. Blumenthal Import Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Midwest Game Company v. MFA Milling CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- McCabe v. Liggett Drug Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Schmoll Fils & Co. v. S. L. Agoos Tanning Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.