Legal Opinion

Brown v. Cavit Sciences, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 2013No. COA13-165PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DILLON, Judge.

Defendant Joseph Connell (Connell) appeals from the trial court’s order denying his Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. For the following reasons, we affirm.

*461I. Factual & Procedural Background

On 16 June 2011, Christopher Brown (Plaintiff) filed a complaint in Mecklenburg County Superior Court alleging claims for relief against Defendants Cavit Sciences, Inc., Robert Hennen, Raymond Bazley, McCoy Enterprises, LLC, Randall McCoy, and Connell (collectively, Defendants). The complaint alleges, inter alia, that Defendants solicited from Plaintiff a short-term $100,000.00 loan;…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Bailey v. GoodingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Collins v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Equitable Leasing Corp. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kbt Realty Servs., Inc. v. Appycity, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2021
  2. Alc Mfg., Inc. v. J. Streicher & Co.North Carolina Business Court · 2020
  3. Aoun & Cole, Inc. v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. Beem USA Limited-Liability Ltd. P'ship v. Grax Consulting, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2020
  5. Edwards v. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Co.North Carolina Business Court · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API