Legal Opinion

Schierenberg v. Howell-Baldwin

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1991No. 73A01-9011-CV-470PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RATLIFF, Chief Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Robert Schierenberg, Paul Schierenberg, and Economy Fire & Casualty Company ("'Eeonomy") bring this interlocutory appeal challenging the trial court's discovery order in a liability claim action. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

ISSUES

1. Whether a discovery order compelling the production of documents contained in a nonparty insurer's file is appealable as of right under Ind.Appellate Rule 4(B)(1).

2, Whether insurance documents containing statements of insurance reserves, settlement authority, and liability opinions are within the scope of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hahn v. Ford Motor Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Clouse v. FielderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Henderson v. Zurn Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1990
  5. Burr v. United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Silva v. Basin Western, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. Richey v. ChappellIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Ramirez v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Amax Coal Co. v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. C & J Real Estate, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API