Legal Opinion

Richey v. Chappell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1992No. 11S01-9206-CV-496PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

KRAHULIK, Justice.

We grant transfer to decide whether a statement of an insured given to his insurer is protected from discovery by a third party.

William G. Chappell (Defendant-Appellee below) ("Chappell") and his insurance company, Indiana Farmers Mutual Insurance Group (Non-Party Respondent Appellee below) ('Farmers"), seek transfer after the Court of Appeals decided that Norman Richey, Denise L. Richey, and Norman Richey, III, (Plaintiffs-Appellants below) (collectively the "Richeys") were entitled to obtain, via a subpoena duces tecum, a copy of a statement given by…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. KociolekSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Miller v. DiltsIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. The People v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State Ex Rel. Cain v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  5. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Erie Insurance v. Hickman Ex Rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re Wthr-TvIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cain v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Wise v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. TP Orthodontics, Inc. v. KeslingIndiana Supreme Court · 2014

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API