Legal Opinion

Brown v. Wilkins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 16, 1991No. 901SC874PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

Defendant assigns two errors on appeal. For the following reasons, we find that the trial court did not err and, therefore, affirm its judgment of 29 March 1990.

Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the issue of contributory negligence. We disagree.

*557It is well established law in this state that if different inferences may reasonably be drawn from the evidence concerning the issue of contributory negligence of one party, then the issue must be submitted to the jury. Atkins v. Moye, 277 N.C. 179, 176 S.E.2d 789 (1970); Boyd v. Wilson,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Atkins v. MoyeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. North Carolina State Bar v. SheffieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Radford v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Wentz v. Unifi, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shelton v. STEELCASE, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Whisnant v. HerreraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Brubach v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. Hamm v. N.C. Department of TransportationNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API