Legal Opinion

In re Lesansky

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 2001No. S079499PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

Since January 1, 1997, the Legislature has provided for summary disbarment of an attorney convicted of a felony involving moral *13turpitude. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6102, subd. (c); Stats. 1996, ch. 1104, § 6.) In this attorney discipline matter, we consider whether an attorney may be summarily disbarred as a result of his felony conviction for attempting to commit a form of child molestation when the crime did not involve a client and did not occur in the practice of law. Because the practice of law requires good moral character, and because petitioner’s felony conviction…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. KippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. J. C. Penney Casualty Insurance v. M. K.California Supreme Court · 1991
  5. In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re LesanskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. (HC) Luebbers v. ArnoldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API