Legal Opinion

Storti v. Town of Fayal

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 14, 1935No. 30,391PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I. M. Olsen, Justice.

The defendant appeals from an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it. fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The court certified that the questions presented by the demurrer are important and doubtful, so as to allow an appeal from the order.

Plaintiff brought the action to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant town, through its officers and servants, in stringing and maintaining a telephone wire over a state highway in such a manner as to render the road…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bolster v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Emmons v. City of VirginiaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Keever v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Dosdall v. County of OlmstedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  5. Charles Bank v. Brainerd School DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Heitman v. City of Lake CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Papenhausen v. SchoenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Johnson v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Nissen v. RedelackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Gillies v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API