Legal Opinion

Gillies v. City of Minneapolis

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided June 17, 1946No. Civil Action 1715PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, District Judge.

The parties have entered into a stipulation of facts, upon which the motion for summary judgment is predicated. This action is brought by plaintiff to recover damages from the City of Minneapolis and one Marcum for injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiff when he was a patient in the Minneapolis General Hospital. It is contended that the defendant Marcum, an orderly employed in the hospital by the City, committed an unjustifiable assault on the plaintiff and that the City is responsible for the negligence of its orderly. The position of the City is that it maintains…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Emmons v. City of VirginiaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  2. Lane v. Minnesota State Agricultural SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Ackeret v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Keever v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. Bryant v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Papenhausen v. SchoenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Fanning v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Schroeder v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  4. Miller v. ChouSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Calomeris v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API