Legal Opinion
Mayer v. Biafore, Florek & O'Neill
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 24, 1997No. AC 16156PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
The plaintiff, Norbert Mayer, appeals from the judgment that followed the trial court’s granting of the defendants’ motion to dismiss in this legal *555malpractice action.1 On appeal, the plaintiff argues that the trial court improperly dismissed the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the basis of ripeness. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are necessary for the resolution of this appeal. On March 30, 1989, the plaintiff was operating his motor vehicle when he was struck by a taxicab owned by Diene Bassirou and operated by Diop Ahmadou…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Catz v. RubensteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Sanborn v. GreenwaldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Milford Power Co v. Alstom Power, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Mayer v. Biafore, Florek & O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Esposito v. SpecyalskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- American Premier Underwriters, Inc. v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Fontanella v. MarcucciConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.