Legal Opinion
Arista Records LLC v. Greubel
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided September 1, 2006No. Civil Action 4:05-CV-531-YPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
MEANS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint [doc. # 15], filed February 24, 2006. Defendant David Greubel asks the Court to dismiss the complaint in its entirety under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), or alternatively, order Plaintiffs to provide a more definite statement in accordance with Rule 12(e). Having carefully reviewed the motion, response, and reply, the Court concludes that the motion should be denied.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND BACKGROUND 1
Plaintiffs Arista Records LLC;…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sony Music Entertainment Inc. v. Does 1-40District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- London-Sire Records, Inc. v. Doe 1District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc. v. BarkerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Atlantic Recording Corp. v. HowellDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
- BMG Rights Management (US) LLC v. Cox Communications, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.