Legal Opinion
DAL MASO v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 3, 1943No. Nos. 2 and 3PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, C. J.
This appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer to a petition for mandamus, which the petitioners had *202filed to the defendants’ answer, the court holding that the petition was insufficient, and the demurrer mounting up to the first error in pleading, it should be and was sustained and the petition dismissed, from which the petitioners appeal.
It appears from the. petition that on April 17, 1942, application was made by the appellants, Joseph Dal Maso and Leo Dal Maso, to the Maryland-National Capitol Park and Planning Commission for the rezoning of their property at Riverdale in Prince…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Board of Zoning Appeals v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Tighe v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- Hoover v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Levin v. HewesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- Humphreys v. WallsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Heaps v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Heath v. M. C.C. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- County Council v. Investors Funding Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Thompson v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
- Board of County Commissioners v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.