Legal Opinion

Tighe v. Osborne

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 8, 1926PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, J.

This appeal involves the question of the constitutionality of Ordinance Ho. 522 of the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, which ordinance undertakes to regulate the issuance of “use” permits in Baltimore City for structures to be used for other than residential purposes.

A case between the same parties was before this Court at the October Term (see Tighe v. Osborne, 149 Md. 349), and we then decided that the ordinance involved in that case, which dealt with the same matter, was unconstitutional, and the case was remanded for further proceedings. Mrs. Tighe, the appellant in both cases,…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Buttfield v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Department of Natural Resources v. Linchester Sand & Gravel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Pressman v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  3. Heath v. M. C.C. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  4. Landay v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  5. Lipsitz v. ParrCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API