Legal Opinion

Rostel v. Rostel

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1981No. 5077PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

Bert and Kathryn Rostel were married in May, 1964. In April, 1978, Bert filed for divorce in Anchorage. Because the parties were unable to agree on a division of the marital property, a non-jury trial was held on February 7, 1979. One month later the court issued a written decision dividing the marital property roughly in half, and granting Kathryn $2,500 for her costs and attorney’s fees. As part of the property division, Bert was awarded all the shares of the Rostel Corporation, valued by the court at $54,000. Bert’s primary contention on appeal concerns this valuation.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nail v. NailTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Greater Anchorage Area Borough v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Burrell v. BurrellAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In Re Marriage of FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. In Re Marriage of LukensCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wanberg v. WanbergAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Brooks v. BrooksAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Moffitt v. MoffittAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Richmond v. RichmondAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Zimin v. ZiminAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API