Legal Opinion

Rosita Smith v. Jem Group Inc

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 12, 2013No. 17-35878PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

JEM Group, Inc. (“JEM”) appeals from the district court’s denial of its motion to compel arbitration. The district court held that it had authority to decide whether an arbitration clause contained in an attorney retainer agreement is unconscionable. On the merits, the court held that the clause is unconscionable under Washington law.

We affirm.

I. Background

Rosita Smith is the lead plaintiff in a proposed class action against JEM, Marshall Banks, LLC (“Marshall Banks”), and Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, LLC (“Legal Helpers”). According to the complaint, JEM…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Jessica Kramer v. Toyota Motor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Bridge Fund Capital Corp. v. Fastbucks Franchise Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Nelson v. McGoldrickWashington Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Meadows v. Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. Kimetra Brice v. Haynes Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  3. Brice v. Plain Green, LLC.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  4. Farrow v. Fujitsu America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. Gorden v. Lloyd Ward & Associates, PCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API