Legal Opinion

Centralia State Bank v. Hackett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1926No. 19818. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

This action was brought by the respondent, Centralia State Bank, against the appellants, W. H., Hackett and W. B. Heir, on a written instrument of guaranty, of which the following is a copy:

“Centralia, Washington.
“Feb. 3rd, 1921.
“For value received, we hereby guarantee payment of .any and all indebtedness now owing or which may hereafter be owing or become due from Tilton River Bit. Coal Co. owned by Centralia State Bank of Cen-tralia, .Wash., its successors or assigns, to the extent of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) whether or not said indebtedness or any part thereof be otherwise…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Conner Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Coosa Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Mooney v. Mooney Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Gallery v. National Exchange BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. German-American State Bank v. Soap Lake Salts Remedy Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Higgins v. DanielWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. Yakima First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Post v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API