Legal Opinion
Centralia State Bank v. Hackett
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 1926No. 19818. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
This action was brought by the respondent, Centralia State Bank, against the appellants, W. H., Hackett and W. B. Heir, on a written instrument of guaranty, of which the following is a copy:
“Centralia, Washington.
“Feb. 3rd, 1921.
“For value received, we hereby guarantee payment of .any and all indebtedness now owing or which may hereafter be owing or become due from Tilton River Bit. Coal Co. owned by Centralia State Bank of Cen-tralia, .Wash., its successors or assigns, to the extent of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) whether or not said indebtedness or any part thereof be otherwise…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- O'Conner Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Coosa Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Mooney v. Mooney Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Gallery v. National Exchange BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- German-American State Bank v. Soap Lake Salts Remedy Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by3 opinions
- Higgins v. DanielWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. Yakima First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Post v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939