Legal Opinion

Gallery v. National Exchange Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1879PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Eaton. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

The National Exchange Bank commenced an action of assumpsit to recover a balance claimed to be due on a promissory note made by Gallery and nine others, payable to the order of Samuel Y. Irwin and endorsed by the latter.

The makers of this note were all directors of the Northern Central Mich. R. R. Co. at the date thereof. Samuel Y. Irwin, one of the makers and the payee therein named, was president of the railroad company at the time the note was given, and was also at the same time and continued to be president of said bank. Irwin kept his office at the bank and gave its business and loan…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Lewis v. WestoverMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Bank of Moore v. ForsythMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Park Hotel Co. v. Fourth Nat. Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  3. Mooney v. Mooney Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State Savings Bank v. MontgomeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Peckham v. HendrenIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API