Legal Opinion
Ruotolo v. Fannie Mae
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 13, 2013No. Case No. 09-CV-7851 (KMK)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge.
According to the allegations in his SetL ond Amended Complaint (the “SAC”), pro se Plaintiff Angelo Ruotolo hoped to purchase a home in foreclosure from Defendant Fannie Mae, the owner of the property. Plaintiff -claims that he attempted to submit an all-cash offer of $131,000 for the property, but Fannie Mae ultimately sold the property to someone else for $130,000. (SAC ¶¶ 15,15(a).)
Plaintiff attempts to make a federal case out of the failed real estate transaction. Plaintiffs SAC includes a series of wide-ranging allegations against Fannie…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Radiancy, Inc. v. Viatek Consumer Products Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Kendall v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Costa v. Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Taft v. Agricultural Bank of China Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Ruotolo v. Fannie MaeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.