Legal Opinion
Ruotolo v. Fannie Mae
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 16, 2015No. 519093PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Mott, J.), entered March 12, 2014 in Ulster County, which granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint.
Plaintiff commenced the instant action pro se in November 2013 alleging that defendants Patty Conti, Patty Conti Realty, Margaret Stewart and Marilyn VanAken (hereinafter collectively referred to as the realty defendants) had breached a fiduciary duty to him and engaged in deceptive business practices and false advertising (see General Business Law §§ 349, 350), and that defendant Fannie Mae had also engaged in deceptive business practices…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Corsello v. Verizon New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2012
- 511 West 232nd Owners Corp. v. Jennifer Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Eurycleia Partners, LP v. Seward & Kissel, LLPNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Sokoloff v. Harriman Estates Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of New York Workers' Compensation Board v. WangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Ferguson v. HartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Center for Jud. Accountability v. New York State Joint Commn. on Pub. EthicsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024