Legal Opinion

Taft v. Agricultural Bank of China Ltd.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 6, 2016No. 15 Civ. 5321 (PAE)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge

This case involves allegations of anti-whistleblower retaliation and gender-based discrimination. Plaintiff Natasha Taft al*410leges that she was employed by defendant Agricultural Bank of China Ltd. (“ABC”) as chief compliance officer in the New York office until she was constructively discharged after under a year of employment. She alleges that she was subjected to frequent sexually charged comments and gender-related mistreatment, and, further, that ABC retaliated against her after she brought certain issues to the attention of the Federal…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Greene v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Barrick v. PNGI Charles Town Gaming, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2019
  3. Barrick v. Pngi Charles Town Gaming, LLCUnited States District Court · 2019
  4. Enhanced US LLC v. World Aquatics, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025
  5. Shaikh v. National Bank of PakistanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API