Legal Opinion
Brodsky v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 19, 1961No. 39113PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
Marion Brodsky and his wife were injured as a result of an accident at a railroad • crossing on a heavily travelled Tulsa street. 'They filed their separate action for damages against the defendant, Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, and in the trial court defendant’s demurrers to the petitions were sustained upon the ground there were no sufficient allegations of proximate cause. Plaintiffs have appealed. Since in all pertinent details the petitions were the same, the cases are argued and considered together here.
When the sufficiency of a petition is challenged…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Okmulgee v. HemphillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Norman v. Scrivner-Stevens Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Crews v. GarberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Safeway Stores, Incorporated v. MusfeltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Minor v. Zidell TrustSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Lay v. DwormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Jackson v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Willard v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.