Legal Opinion

Crews v. Garber

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 25, 1941No. 26529PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This, action involves the liability of a bank director for failure to perform his common-law and statutory duties, and the right of the owners of an escrow account to maintain an action against a director for damages caused by the loss of the account due to such failure.

Plaintiffs seek to recover from the defendant Garber, a director and officer in the Farmers State Bank of Garber, losses sustained by them as owners of a special escrow account, known as the “Crews Estate Oil & Gas Producers Escrow,” as a result of defalcations by the active officers and other directors of that bank, and the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Briggs v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Bowerman v. HamnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. United Society of Shakers v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1873
  4. Browne v. HammettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. Savings Bank of Louisville's Assignee v. CapertonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Seitz v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. Gay v. AkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Hughes v. BizzellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Brodsky v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Raley v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API