Legal Opinion
Beaida v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 17, 1968No. Civ. 11807PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.
The question is whether the workmen’s compensation claimant effectively instituted supplementary proceedings for an increased disability award within the five-year period of limitations fixed by the Labor Code. He suffered a compensable back injury on December 14, 1961. On September 11, 1964, he was awarded 25% percent permanent disability with further medical care. He had an attorney of record in the proceeding. Dr. Thomas J. Cummings was one of the treating physicians. In November 1964 an order of commutation was made at the claimant’s request. Between August and November 1965 the same…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- National Labor Relations Board v. Monsanto Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- Fruehauf Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Gage v. GuntherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Sutton v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bland v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Gross v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Hulbert v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Johnson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Zurich Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.