Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Ohlhausen
District Court, E.D. Illinois
Decided April 10, 1947No. 44C763PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
The defendant has moved to dismiss this action on the ground that it has expired. The defendant’s contention is that since Chester Bowles resigned as Price Administrator on February 26, 1946, and was replaced by Paul A. Porter, substitution of Paul A. Porter as plaintiff was required within the six-monih period specified by 28 U.S.C.A. .§ 780 and Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c. Counsel for the Office of Price Administration did not move to substitute Paul A. Porter as plaintiff until October 8, 1946.
■ The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Bernardin v. ButterworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Fix v. Philadelphia Barge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Oklahoma Ex Rel. Phillips v. American Book Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Oklahoma ex rel. McVey v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bowles v. WilkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Fleming v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Lawrence Warehouse Co. v. Defense Supplies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Four Star Publications, Inc. v. ErbeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Bowles v. SeigelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.