Legal Opinion
Lawrence Warehouse Co. v. Defense Supplies Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 6, 1948No. 11418PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
Motion of Reconstruction Finance Corporation.
The Reconstruction Finance Corporation, purportedly joined by the Defense Supplies Corporation, moves to amend the complaint and judgment herein by substituting the Reconstruction Finance Corporation as plaintiff and judgment creditor and to substitute it as appellee in this Court.
The admitted facts are that Defense Supplies Corporation ceased to exist on July 1, 1945, by virtue of the Act of Congress of Ju'ne 30, 1945, dissolving that corporation; that after it ceased to exist, the trial of the case in the District Court on…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mitchell v. MaurerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Anderson v. YungkauSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Mumma v. Potomac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1834
- National Bank v. ColbySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Defense Supplies Corp. v. Lawrence Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- William A. McClendon v. T. L. James & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Howard Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Capitol Chevrolet Co. v. Lawrence Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. FieldingDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.