Legal Opinion

Fix v. Philadelphia Barge Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 8, 1934No. 153PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland

This is an action originally brought by MacLaughlin, a cpllector of internal revenue, in a federal district court, against respondents, to recover on a bond conditioned for the payment of such income taxes assessed against the Barge Company as should remain unabated'after consideration of a claim for abatement by thé Commissioner of Internal Revenue. The obligee named in the bond is Ephraim Lederer, collector of internal revenue when the bond was executed, “ or his successors.” MacLaughlin having died, the case was first revived in the name of Ladner, and upon his resignation, in the name of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Irwin v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Green v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. United States Ex Rel. Bernardin v. ButterworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Murphy v. UtterSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Caledonian Coal Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Becker Steel Co. of America v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Defense Supplies Corp. v. Lawrence Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Bowles v. WilkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  4. Lawrence Warehouse Co. v. Defense Supplies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  5. Bowles v. OhlhausenDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API